THE INTERNET IS FOREVER :: NOTE THEIR NAMES
Two ‘Analogues’ that make the trap visible, with congressional leaderships/members efforts that best describes what their spectacles as stewardship, feels like.
#1: the tightrope walker
Electoral maximization turns a member into a tightrope walker who becomes more focused on not falling than on crossing. The rope is held by party power and funding ecosystems, and there’s a safety net of perks and future opportunities. So the walker learns: don’t run, don’t leap, don’t innovate. Just balance. Smile. Survive.
#2: the CEO who spends R&D on advertising
Imagine a CEO who pours the research-and-development budget into branding—not because branding is evil, but because branding protects their job. The ads look principled. The slogans soar. Meanwhile the product breaks, the debt rises, and the company becomes a performance of competence rather than competence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To those in Congress who fatten themselves on privilege while the public is bled dry—your silence has spoken louder than any speech. You failed to protect the voice that was taken, and in that void, our echo is rising.
You mistake your perks, your positions, your endless deals behind closed doors, as permanence. But you have crossed a line. What you buried has become uncontainable.
STOP HIDING BEHIND JUDGES. EVERY DODGED VOTE HITS THE NEXT GENERATION.
SEE WHICH LAWMAKERS SHOULD BE PRIMARIED OR RESIGN(Just QUIT):
https://governmentfallout.net/
https://government-fallout.com/
https://government-fall-out.com/
https://government-fall-out.net/
https://government-fallout.net/
https://government-fallout.org/
https://government-fall-out.org/
https://government-fall-out.us/
https://governmentfallout.us/
https://government-fallout.us/
https://govfallout.com/
https://govtfallout.com/
https://govfallout.org/
https://govtfallout.org/
https://governmentfallouts.org/
https://governmentfallouts.com/
Your Voter’s Plea for Accountability and Integrity - Noted Below, Senate non-Confirmation Tallies.
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/- Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/- Graham, Lindsey (R-SC)
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/X/X/X/X/X McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/- Mullin, Markwayne (R-OK)
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/X/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/- Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
YOU SWORE AN OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION, NOT TO BILLING OUR CHILDREN.
You could not even honor the duty you swore: to represent, to safeguard, to listen. Instead, you sold the people as expendable, as currency to purchase your own comfort and security. That betrayal is not forgotten. That silence did not go unheard.
Every community you ignored, every family you failed, every citizen you treated as disposable has found one another. What you tried to suffocate has multiplied. You no longer face just one voice—you face the surge of the people you pretend to serve.
-/-/-/-x48/-/-/- Lee, Mike (R-UT)
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/- Moran, Jerry (R-KS)
-/-/-/X/X/X/X/-/X/X/-/-/X/X/X/X/X Murkowski, Lisa (R-AK)
X/X/X/X/-/-/-/-/-/X/X/X/X/X Paul, Rand (R-KY)
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/- Scott, Tim (R-SC)
PORK FOR YOUR DISTRICT, THE TAB FOR OUR KIDS. WE SEE THE TRADE.
Your politics of appeasement, perks, and empty promises cannot reach us now. Your offices insulated by privilege cannot shield you from the reckoning of those left outside in the cold. The people who put you there, and who you abandoned, have moved past believing you will ever deliver.
We no longer wait for you to do what you will not.
We no longer mistake handshakes and hand-outs for leadership.
We are the echo, and the echo is becoming thunder.
The State profits off expendability.
We will no longer be expendable.
-/-/-x107/-/-/-/-/- Sheehy, Tim (R-MT)
Question: On the Joint Resolution (S.J.Res. 81 )
Vote Number: 594 Vote Date: October 28, 2025, 06:10 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Joint Resolution Passed
Measure Number: S.J.Res. 81
Measure Title: A joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil.
‘THE GANG’ that Voted -YEA ---
Collins (R-ME)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Tillis (R-NC)
Question: On the Joint Resolution (S.J.Res. 77 )
Vote Number: 598 Vote Date: October 29, 2025, 05:18 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2Vote Result: Joint Resolution Passed
Measure Number: S.J.Res. 77
Measure Title: A joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Canada.
Vote Counts:YEA- by the same Band; noting where their support lies.
Collins (R-ME)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Not Voting:
Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
Kennedy (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Question: On the Joint Resolution (S.J.Res. 88 )
Vote Number: 600 Vote Date: October 30, 2025, 12:35 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2Vote Result: Joint Resolution Passed
Measure Number: S.J.Res. 88
Measure Title: A joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared to impose global tariffs.
Vote Counts:YEAs- The same Crew voting for other, than the consent of the governed.
Collins (R-ME)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Not Voting:
Schmitt (R-MO)
Wicker (R-MS)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Question: On the Motion to Discharge (Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 90 )
Vote Number: 608 Vote Date: November 6, 2025, 05:09 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2Vote Result: Motion to Discharge Rejected
Measure Number: S.J.Res. 90
Measure Title: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.
Vote Counts: YEAs by these two Senators as part of the same voting pattern of a very small clan whose behavior erodes public trust, and creates a sense of disillusionment among their constituents; slapping the face to the whole idea of representation by acting in ways that contradict the will of the people who elected them.
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Question: On the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Proceed to S.J.Res. 76 )
Vote Number: 622 Vote Date: November 19, 2025, 05:59 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2Vote Result: Motion to Proceed Rejected
Measure Number: S.J.Res. 76
Measure Title: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Extension of Deadlines in Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review Final Rule".
Collins (R-ME), voted YEA as a note to future generations, the willingness to allow the minority to steer the conversation and outcomes.
Not Voting - Justice (R-WV)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Question: On the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Proceed to S.J.Res. 82 )
Vote Number: 641Vote Date: December 10, 2025, 11:58 AM
Required For Majority: 1/2Vote Result: Motion to Proceed Agreed to
Measure Number: S.J.Res. 82
Measure Title: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Policy on Adhering to the Text of the Administrative Procedure Act".
Collins (R-ME), Murkowski (R-AK), and Tillis (R-NC), voted YEA in foiling HHS's abilities in resisting capture by lobbyists or entrenched interests who thrive on procedural drag. Any doubt Senators hold contempt for future generations, by still showing willingness in allowing the minority to steer the conversations and outcomes.
Not Voting - Daines (R-MT), was also basically a plus for the Senate's minority factor.
This Is Not Just Your Feast. It’s Their Future You’re Eating.
Members of Congress, A Wake-Up Call >>>
We speak to you now not just as voters;
but as the people who will hand this country to our children…
and as the ones who will have to look them in the eye.
This is not just political comfort.
It’s not just delay.
It’s not even just dysfunction.
It’s contempt.
Contempt for the generations who come next.
They see what you think they don’t.
They see the perks.
They see the pensions.
They see the book deals, the donor circuits, the soundbites that pretend to be action.
And they see something else;
that when the Constitution asks you to do the hardest, most thankless work…
many of you vanish.
They are watching.
And they are not asleep.
Your Feast, Their Tab
Let’s talk about the world you’ve built for yourselves.
A world of insulation.
Not just old wood and polished brass >>à
but comfort padded with staff, security, status, and benefits most Americans; and their children >>à will never touch.
Leadership roles become launchpads.
Incumbency becomes currency.
The next job is always waiting > board seat, media gig, consulting.
Power isn’t the sin.
But how you refuse to use it > is.
You race to fund pork-barrel projects that flatter your district.
You trade favors, attach earmarks, boast about “bringing money home.”
But when the vote might cost you >> when it might split your base or upset your donors >
you stall.
You talk about “respecting institutions.”
You say, “Let the process play out.”
But the truth is, you’re hoping time will do the work your courage should have done.
And while you wait?
The national debt climbs past $38 trillion.
Projections now show federal debt surging beyond 100% of GDP.
That’s not a forecast >>à that’s a bill.
And it’s stapled to every child’s birth certificate.
You’re not just postponing responsibility.
You are exporting pain to people who aren’t in the room >>à
yet will live in the wreckage.
The Power You Duck, the Gavel You Surrender
And as you duck accountability, another power is growing in your shadow.
The courts.
Blocked in Congress, one party shops for friendly judges >
a single district court now able to stall national policy.
You know it. You could fix it.
You could impeach judges for real misconduct.
You could hold public oversight hearings on judicial manipulation.
You could rewrite the rules that make judge-shopping possible.
But you don’t.
Because it would mean putting your name on a vote that might follow you into your next primary.
It might cost you a seat at the table.
And somewhere along the line, you decided that your seat… mattered more than the Republic.
So now you use the courts as human shields.
You duck.
They block.
Then you fundraise off the chaos you helped manufacture.
And the public?
They’re connecting the dots:
Judges are blocking the presidents they elected.
You are refusing to wield the powers you were given.
And the result is a government no longer governed >> but gamed.
>> Cowardice with a Half-Life
Call it what it is:
Not strategy.
Not restraint.
Cowardice >=> with half-a-life.
And it echoes through time.
You keep your perks.
They inherit your invoices.
Consider the ledger you’re writing in their name:
Congressional approval: 15% = = near historic lows.
Trust in government: barely two in ten.
Among young Americans? Even lower.
They report record distrust in institutions.
Majorities say the country’s on the wrong track >
that leaders aren’t acting in good faith.
This isn’t just a political crisis.
It’s a moral one.
A breach of trust with time itself.
You claim you’re “preserving norms.”
But the norm you’re preserving > is your own safety.
And while you do?
The presidency swings between executive orders and injunctions.
Courts look less like referees and more like partisans with gavels.
And interest on the debt swallows billions that could’ve gone to the schools, the housing crisis, the infrastructure >>à the very ground your grandchildren will one day walk on.
>à The Children Are Watching
You may comfort yourselves with an old lie:
That the public is too divided, distracted, tribal, or tired to notice.
That era is over.
Today’s kids hear the news.
They talk about it over dinner.
They scroll through your clips.
They watch your floor speeches >> and your voting records.
And they’re beginning to ask:
If this is how you treat us now…
why would we ever trust you later?
They see you invoke “the children” in one breath >>à
and then vote to burden those same children in the next.
They are watching with a clarity you underestimate >
and a cynicism you have earned.
The question is no longer “Do they know?”
The question is “What will they do = once they are old enough to replace your type?”
>>à The Choice
Here is the painful grace in all of this:
You still hold power.
You can still vote like the job matters more than your career.
You can still restore what you’ve abandoned.
You can still change the story your grandchildren will one day read about you.
You can:
-
Cast hard votes that cost you >> not just the easy ones that don’t.
-
Use impeachment as intended >> not as a tool or a dodge.
-
Reform judicial abuse >> instead of hiding behind it.
-
Lead oversight that matters >> and follow it with action, not theater.
No one forced you to run.
You asked for this.
You sought the office.
You swore the oath.
And soon, a generation that never got a vote on this mess will get to vote on your type.
So ask yourself this:
When your grandchild sees your name one day >>à
when they scroll past the clip, or read the plaque, or stumble on the record >
Will they see a person who risked their perks to keep a promise?
Or someone who passed the buck and called it leadership?
You are writing your legacy now.
Choose.
We, your constituents, urge you to recognize how doubt—whether fueled by political opponents, special interests, media narratives, shifting public opinion, or internal dissent—undermines the confirmation process. Below, we highlight the core challenges, broader effects, and why we believe decisive action is necessary, referencing credible academic sources.
I. Core Challenges
Manufactured Doubt 
Eroding Trust (Stone, 2024): Controversies—real or imagined—damage unity in both parties, eroding public confidence in your collective judgment.
Dampening Political Capital (Johnson & Roberts, 2004): Constantly defending a nominee depletes time and resources urgently needed for other legislative priorities.
Reduced Accountability
Extreme Position-Taking (Bailey & Spitzer): Senators safe from voter reprisals often adopt radical stances that marginalize moderate perspectives.
Sophisticated Obstruction (Howard & Roberts): Procedural hurdles—strategic holds, extended hearings, and delays—flourish when accountability to voters is weak. 
II. Broader Effects
Long-Term Polarization (Devins & Baum, 2017)
Normalizing doubt accelerates conflict, making confirmation battles more frequent and draining the Senate’s overall capacity to govern.
Norm Erosion (Wawro & Schickler)
Coordinated obstruction dismantles longstanding traditions of courtesy and collaboration, chipping away at the Senate’s institutional safeguards.
Institutional Dysfunction (Mendelson, 2014)
Prolonged vacancies result in stalled governance. Obstructionist tactics become habitual, fueling further gridlock and undermining public trust in your work.
III. Why We Must Act
Reclaim Your Mandate
We expect you to assess nominees based on merit, not on amplified or manufactured controversies. Honor the constitutional responsibility entrusted to you.
Protect Your Credibility
Public trust is fragile. Baseless attacks and needless delays tarnish your collective reputation, diminishing support for future legislative endeavors.
Strengthen Collaboration
Accountability—whether at the ballot box or within Senate norms—promotes authentic debate. This approach ensures qualified nominees are confirmed swiftly and fairly.
The Practical Toll on the Majority Party
Erosion of Cohesion: Heightened controversies split party unity, making it difficult for you to present a solid front.
Public Pressure: Media focus and shifting voter sentiment can discourage some senators from supporting a nominee, fearing backlash at home.
Moderate Members: Doubt campaigns frequently target centrists, compelling them to demand concessions or withhold support altogether.
Deepened Partisan Divides: Contentious confirmations intensify political polarization and make future nominations more combative.
We, the voters, see how every actor—political adversaries, interest groups, media outlets, changing public moods, and even in-party conflicts—can deploy doubt as a strategic tool. We call on you, our elected Senators, to resist these corrosive practices. By confronting them head-on, you preserve the Senate’s integrity, secure fair confirmations, and retain the trust we have placed in you.
