Skip to main content

Silencing the Alarm:  How the World’s Bigwigs Hide the Truth About Nuclear War to Maintain Social Stability

ILLUSION OF SAFETY

Hey there, compatriots! Ever caught yourself pondering what the world's bigwigs might do if things went all "boom" on the nuclear front? Let's have a little heart-to-heart about that, shall we?

Imagine, just for a moment, that a hypothetical scenario unfolds where Russia decides to play a not-so-friendly game of catch with nuclear footballs aimed at the U.S. Cities like Washington D.C., New York, L.A., Chicago, Houston—you know, the headliners—would probably be first on the dance floor. Not exactly the kind of spotlight you want to be under, right?

So, what's a global elite to do before times like these? Well, they might just pack up their designer bags and head for the hills—literally! Here's the scoop:

1. Escape to the Great Wide Open

Picture sprawling ranches and cozy cabins tucked away in rural America. Away from the hustle and, more importantly, away from the target zones. It's like their own private getaway, minus the paparazzi.

2. Luxury Hideaways

Think exclusive retreats and swanky resort towns. Aspen, anyone? These spots offer all the comforts of high society without the pesky mushroom clouds on the horizon.

3. International Jet-Setting

Why stay put when you can hop over to neutral countries or remote locales? Switzerland's neutrality isn't just for show, and those secluded islands look pretty inviting right about now.

4. Underground Bunkers (Yes, Really!)

Remember those secret lairs villains always have in movies? Turns out, they're not just for the big screen. Underground facilities stocked with gourmet food and plush amenities are definitely on the table.

5. Secondary Cities and Suburbs

If they can't be off-grid, blending into less obvious urban areas might be the next best thing. It's like playing a high-stakes game of hide and seek.  

URBAN HIDEOUT

6. Keep It Mobile

Why settle down when you can keep moving? Yachts, private jets, maybe a tricked-out RV—mobility is the name of the game when you want to stay one step ahead.

7. Gated Paradises

Exclusive communities and private islands offer security and luxury wrapped in a neat little package. It's the elite version of a neighborhood watch.

But here's where it gets interesting—you might be thinking, "Why don't they just tell us what's up?" Great question!

Why the Hush-Hush?

1. Avoiding Mass Panic

Imagine the chaos if everyone knew a nuclear war was on the table. By keeping things on the down-low, they hope to maintain some semblance of normalcy. After all, a calm public is a cooperative public.  ROLL OF THE DICE

2. Playing Their Cards Close

Being transparent could mess with strategic advantages. They might prefer to keep certain moves under wraps to stay ahead in the geopolitical chess game.

3. Banking on Deterrence

There's this thing called Mutual Assured Destruction—fancy talk for "if you nuke us, we'll nuke you." Some (this means exactly which ‘SOME’) believe this threat is enough to keep everyone in check. So, they figure, why worry people over something they think won't actually happen?

So, What's the Deal for Us?

While the big shots are plotting their next move, it might be a good time for us regular folks to think about our own plans—just in case. Maybe it's stocking up on essentials, maybe it's having an evacuation plan, or maybe it's just staying informed.

At the end of the day, it's all about looking out for ourselves and each other. And hey, if nothing else, at least we had this little chat to get the gears turning, right?

Stay savvy, my compatriots!

*

GRIFTER LEADER'S U

 

  TOO WEAK TO RULE, THEY ARE!!

Roll Call 353 | Bill Number: H. Res. 1344    

Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena

'NO' VOTES
Duarte > California    
Joyce > Ohio    
McClintock > California    
Turner > Ohio    

POLITICAL CAPTURE, STATE CAPTURE, and REGULATORY CAPTURE, are forms of capture that exacerbate inequalities, undermine democratic values, economic growth, and trust in government.

'NO SHOW' VOTES
Armstrong > North Dakota
Crenshaw > Texas
Granger > Texas
LaMalfa > California
Lamborn > Colorado
LaTurner > Kansas
Lee > Florida    
McHenry > North Carolina    
Miller-Meeks > Iowa    
Rogers > Alabama 
   
 

Federal agencies have enacted a coup d'état by assuming powers that belong to God. They make their own rules, enforce them, and hold or bypass hearings as they see fit. Unelected officials have become a 4th Branch of Government with unchecked jurisdiction. This includes agencies such as the DOJ, CIA, DIA, NSA, DHS, and FBI. They often disregard laws and calls for transparency.
    Barrasso (WY)
    Boozman (AR)
    Britt (AL)
    Budd (NC)
    Cassidy (LA)
    Collins (ME)
    Cornyn (TX)FISA OKAYERS
    Cotton (AR)
    Crapo (ID)
    Ernst (IA)
    Fischer (NE)
    Graham (SC)
    Grassley (IA)FISA CHECKED
    Hyde-Smith (MS)
    Kennedy (LA)
    King (ME)
    Lankford (OK)
    McConnell (KY)
    Moran (KS)
    Mullin (OK)
    Murkowski (AK)
    Ricketts (NE)
    Risch (ID)
    Romney (UT)
    Rounds (SD)
    Rubio (FL)
    Sullivan (AK)
    Thune (SD)
    Tillis (NC)
    Wicker (MS)
    Young (IN)

EXCESSIVE DEFERENCE TO EXECUTIVE AGENCIES: AN ATTACK ON AMERICANS

Loss and risk aversion in leaderships are seldom held accountable for their failure‭ ‬to‭ ‬act,‭ ‬though‭ ‬this‭ ‬non-action‭ ‬can‭ ‬be‭ ‬even‭ ‬more costly.‭

Loss and risk aversion in leaderships appear to figure that omissions of actions are harder to notice,‭ ‬than how costly‭ ‬ failure could be.

Loss and risk aversion in leadership causes them to make less standard and safe choices.

This loss and‭ ‬risk‭ ‬aversion‭ ‬means‭ ‬leaders‭ ‬often‭ ‬tend to‭ ‬prefer avoiding mistakes at the expense of acquiring‭ ‬successes.

Loss and risk aversion in leadership‭ ‬hate errors‭ ‬even‭ ‬more than‭ ‬they‭ ‬like successes.
‭  
Loss and risk aversion in leadership is willing to just ride things out.

Loss and risk aversion in leadership causes them to make less standard‭ ‬and safe choices while waiting for their next promotion or retirement.

THE SPEAKER's BAND:  IT'S THE SAME NAMES-

  1. Aderholt -Alabama

  2. Bacon -Nebraska

  3. Balderson -Ohio

  4. Barr -Kentucky

  5. Bice -Oklahoma

  6. Buchanan -Florida 

  7. Bucshon -Indiana

  8. Burgess -Texas

  9. Calvert -California

  10. Carl -Alabama

  11. Carter (GA) Georgia

  12. Carter (TX) Texas

    FISA VOTERS
  13. Chavez-ReRemer -Oregon

  14. Cole -Oklahoma 

  15. Crawford -Arkansas

  16. Crenshaw -Texas

  17. D'Esposito -New York

  18. De La Cruz -Texas 

  19. Diaz-Balart -Florida 

  20. Duarte -California

  21. Ellzey -Texas

  22. Estes -Kansas

  23. Ezell -Mississippi

  24. Feenstra -Iowa

  25. Ferguson -Georgia

  26. Fitzpatrick -Pennsylvania 

  27. Flood -Nebraska

  28. Franklin, Scott -Florida

  29. Gallagher -Wisconsin

  30. Garbarino -New York

  31. Garcia, Mike -California

  32. Gimenez -Florida

  33. Gonzales, Tony -Texas

  34. Granger -Texas

  35. Graves (MO) Missouri

  36. Guthrie -Kentucky

  37. Hill -Arkansas

  38. Hinson -Iowa

  39. Johnson (LA) Louisiana

  40. Joyce (OH) Ohio

  41. Kean (NJ) New Jersey

  42. Kelly (MS) Mississippi

  43. Kelly (PA) Pennsylvania

  44. Kiggans (VA) Virginia

  45. Kim (CA) California

  46. Kustoff -Tennessee

  47. LaHood -Illinois

  48. LaLota -New York

  49. Lamborn -Colorado

  50. Latta -Ohio

    FISA OKAY VOTERS

     

  51. LaTurner -Kansas

  52. Lawler -New York

  53. Letlow -Louisiana

  54. Lucas -Oklahoma

  55. Malliotakis -New York

  56. McCaul -Texas

  57. McHenry -North Carolina

  58. Miller (OH) Ohio

  59. Miller (WV) West Virginia

  60. Miller-Meeks -Iowa

  61. Moore (UT) Utah

  62. Moylan -Guam

  63. Murphy -North Carolina

  64. Nunn (IA) Iowa

  65. Obernolte -California

  66. Pence -Indiana

  67. Pfluger -Texas 

  68. Rogers (AL) Alabama

  69. Rogers (KY) Kentucky

  70. Rouzer -North Carolina

  71. Rutherford -Florida

  72. Salazar -Florida

  73. Scalise -Louisiana

  74. Scott, Austin -Georgia

  75. Smith (NE) Nebraska

  76. Smucker -Pennsylvania

  77. Stefanik -New York

  78. Strong -Alabama

  79. Tenney -New York

  80. Turner -Ohio 

  81. Valadao -California 

  82. Van Orden -Wisconsin 

  83. Wagner -Missouri

  84. Waltz -Florida

  85. Wenstrup -Ohio

  86. Womack -Arkansas