Skip to main content
*
TOO WEAK TO RULE, THEY ARE!!
Roll Call 353 | Bill Number: H. Res. 1344
Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena
'NO' VOTES
Duarte > California
Joyce > Ohio
McClintock > California
Turner > Ohio
POLITICAL CAPTURE, STATE CAPTURE, and REGULATORY CAPTURE, are forms of capture that exacerbate inequalities, undermine democratic values, economic growth, and trust in government.
'NO SHOW' VOTES
Armstrong > North Dakota
Crenshaw > Texas
Granger > Texas
LaMalfa > California
Lamborn > Colorado
LaTurner > Kansas
Lee > Florida
McHenry > North Carolina
Miller-Meeks > Iowa
Rogers > Alabama
A Betrayal of Trust: Self-Serving Politics and Its Fallout of Passing a 5-YEAR Handicapping Act
THE OFFICIALS LISTED BELOW: PASSED the "REPO for Ukrainians Act" without taking any actions on securing the BORDER.
Recent actions by certain Self-Serving elected representatives (example: Michael McCaul (R-Texas)) and senators (example: Jim Risch (R-Idaho)) have caused significant unrest, signaling a shift from the leadership we were promised to a more self-serving approach. This shift feels like a betrayal of the trust we placed in these officials, who seem to prioritize industry interests over those of the public.
As constituents, we are left with frustration and anger as we witness our leaders fall short of their responsibilities.
Comparing both House and Senate politicians to franchisees following industry mandates, it appears that some officials are acting as if they are beholden to external pressures rather than serving the people. This "franchisor-franchisee" relationship has taken root in the political arena, with politicians adhering to the demands of industries dictating the services to be provided—whether it's "tools of war" or "nation rebuilding" initiatives. This shift toward transactional leadership undermines the core principles of representation.
The ramifications of this betrayal are extensive. There's a loss of trust and credibility among the electorate, leading to decreased civic engagement and a widening gap between the people and their representatives. When officials prioritize self-interest over public service, they undermine the spirit of democracy, causing disillusionment and fostering political instability. These adverse outcomes, consistently observed in this 118th Congress, hinder community growth and impede the progress of critical initiatives.
Many of us feel profoundly disappointed by the lack of accountability and the apparent departure from the commitments made during campaigns. We need our elected officials to act as true representatives of the people, not as franchisees complying with industry demands. It's crucial for them to prioritize our interests, working towards the collective good rather than pursuing personal or external gains.
This breach of trust can lead to serious consequences, from voter backlash to mounting political opposition. When our concerns are ignored, we are more likely to organize and challenge the status quo, creating a groundswell for change. Politicians risk alienating their support base and facing stronger public criticism if they continue to act against the interests of their constituents.
To these elected officials, we implore you to remember your responsibility to serve the people. You should not be franchisees catering to industry directives. Your actions should reflect the values and needs of those who elected you. Failure to heed this call will not only harm your political careers but also damage the communities you were entrusted to represent.
Let this be a call to action: reconnect with your constituents, listen to their concerns, and act with integrity. The future of our democracy depends on leaders who prioritize the public interest and work tirelessly to rebuild the trust that has been lost.
Boozman (AR)
Britt (AL)
Capito (WV)
Cassidy (LA)
Collins (ME)
Cornyn (TX)
Cotton (AR)
Cramer (ND)
Crapo (ID)
Ernst (IA)
Fischer (NE)
Graham (SC)
Grassley (IA)
Hoeven (ND)
Hyde-Smith (MS)
Kennedy (LA)
Lankford (OK)
McConnell (KY)
Moran (KS)
Mullin (OK)
Murkowski (AK)
Ricketts (NE)
Risch (ID)
Romney (UT)
Rounds (SD)
Scott (SC)
Sullivan (AK)
Thune (SD)
Tillis (NC)
Wicker (MS)
Young (IN)
Aderholt-Alabama
Bacon- Nebraska
Barr- Kentucky
Bentz- Oregon
Bice- Oklahoma
Buchanan- Florida
Bucshon- Indiana
Burgess- Texas
Calvert - California
Carey- Ohio
Carter- Georgia
Carter- Texas
Chavez-DeRemer- Oregon
Ciscomani- Arizona
Cole- Oklahoma
Crenshaw- Texas
Curtis- Utah
D'Esposito- New York
Diaz-Balart- Florida
Duarte- California
Dunn- Florida
Edwards- North Carolina
Ellzey- Texas
Emmer- Minnesota
Feenstra- Iowa
Ferguson- Georgia
Fitzpatrick- Pennsylvania
Fleischmann- Tennessee
Flood- Nebraska
Foxx- North Carolina
Gallagher- Wisconsin
Garbarino- New York
Garcia, Mike- California
Gimenez- Florida
Gonzales, Tony- Texas
Granger- Texas
Graves- Missouri
Griffith- Virginia
Guthrie- Kentucky
Hill- Arkansas
Hinson - Iowa
Houchin- Indiana
Hudson- North Carolina
Issa- California
James- Michigan
Johnson- Louisiana
Johnson- South Dakota
Joyce- Ohio
Kean- New Jersey
Kelly- Pennsylvania
Kiggans- Virginia
Kiley- California
Kim- California
Kustoff- Tennessee
LaHood- Illinois
LaLota- New York
Lamborn- Colorado
Latta- Ohio
LaTurner- Kansas
Lawler- New York
Lucas- Oklahoma
McCaul- Texas
McClintock- California
McCormick- Georgia
McHenry- North Carolina
Miller- Ohio
Miller- West Virginia
Miller-Meeks- Iowa
Molinaro- New York
Moore- Utah
Moran- Texas
Murphy- North Carolina
Newhouse- Washington
Nunn- Iowa
Pence- Indiana
Reschenthaler- Pennsylvania
Rodgers- Washington
Rogers- Alabama
Rogers- Kentucky
Rouzer- North Carolina
Rutherford- Florida
Salazar - Florida
Scalise- Louisiana
Schweikert- Arizona
Scott, Austin- Georgia
Sessions- Texas
Simpson- Idaho
Smith- Nebraska
Smith- New Jersey
Smucker- Pennsylvania
Steel- California
Thompson- Pennsylvania
Turner- Ohio
Valadao- California
Wagner- Missouri
Wenstrup- Ohio
Westerman- Arkansas
Wilson- South Carolina
Wittman- Virginia
Womack- Arkansas
Yakym- Indiana
A Salute to Our Courageous Representatives: True Leadership in Congress
In this era of political evasion and indecision, where challenging decisions are often postponed or avoided, the spotlight turns ever more brightly on the need for decisive, independent leadership. It is rare for few in Congress who, despite the glaring missteps of 'The Speaker', have the courage to stand alone and voice the truths we need to hear.
Being a Congressional representative is not just about holding a seat; it’s about elevating the voices and addressing the concerns of those who placed their trust in you to act on their behalf. You are their advocate, their bridge to governance. A handful of our representatives have taken this role to heart, treating it not as a job but as a sacred duty.
These strong individuals do more than just acknowledge the Speaker's failures—they actively challenge his position, driven not by whims or personal agendas, but by a deep-seated realization of the urgent need for change. Their refusal to table a crucial vote on the Speaker’s leadership
is a bold testament to their commitment to what is right, even if it means facing a storm of opposition.
Despite relentless criticism, these remarkable leaders stand firm, dedicated to truth and justice, advocating for the public good even when drowned out by a chorus of naysayers. Their unwavering commitment to their constituents and our democracy is commendable and deserving of our deepest gratitude.
To these valiant few, we say thank you. Thank you for your service, your integrity, and your willingness to take a stand when it would have been easier to sit back. Your fearless pursuit of truth and justice is not only commendable but serves as a powerful reminder that true leadership is not confined to those at the top but is a mantle anyone can bear, based on bravery, empathy, and an unwavering commitment to doing what is right, even when standing alone.
"STOP the SHADOW ELITE: Take Back OUR Voices, Protect OUR Borders, End WASTEFUL Spending & SAVE Democracy! OUR VOICE, OUR CHOICE!"
The Expanding Shadow of Giant Federal Agencies and Diminished Congressional Oversight
Imagine a thread in our government's tapestry that has grown disproportionately thick, overshadowing other crucial elements. This thread represents the increasing power of federal agencies, which now loom like giants over the traditional branches of our government. These agencies have grown so influential, they resemble deities commanding the order of our governmental cosmos.
The Unchecked Over-Power of Un-elected Officials
A startling and alarming narrative is unfolding around us. It tells of un-elected officials who seem to have created a new, unofficial limb- the fourth branch of our government. This new wielding limb throbs with unchecked power, with its domain reverberating with accusations of overreaching and overstepping legal interpretations crossing the drawn boundaries set by Congress.
Consider the Department of Justice (DOJ), CIA, DIA, NSA, DHS, FBI and more, which sometimes act like children unwilling to relinquish a favorite toy like FISA, bypassing laws and ignoring calls for transparency as through previously congressional subpoenaed documents and full testimonies.
Congressional Oversight: Captured by Job Prestige and the Giving of Powers?
The issue deepens when we look at Congressional oversight, which seems increasingly ineffective against the might of these powerful agencies. There’s a growing concern that Congress, captivated by their job prestige and the giving of authority to these agencies, struggles to enforce its legislative power effectively. This captivation not only diminishes their congressional role but also hampers their ability to rein in the sprawling reach of these agencies.
The Constitutional Dance and Overreach
These mentioned agencies are not just making and implementing rules—they are also judging them, an authority nearly divine. This unchecked expansion threatens the foundations of our democracy with each overreaching decision, nudging aside established laws.
The witnessed narrative warns us of their sprawling reach, which not only surpasses their defined skill-set but also risks ushering in an era of unchecked tyranny. The proposed remedies, such as penalties and fines imposed on government leadership and attorneys, fail to correct their actions or serve as deterrents, merely just draining our collective tax resources.
Reclaim Congressional Authority: Emphasize that our founding fathers placed legislative power firmly within Congress, intending for a government by the people, not by a shadowy elite. Stress the urgent need for these agencies to obtain explicit Congressional approval before assuming significant regulatory powers.
Curtail Wasteful Spending: Highlight how the current representatives in power have permitted unchecked agency overreach, leading to wasteful expenditure and inefficiency. This undermines the balance our founding fathers intended and disrespects the constitutional framework.
Demand Vigilance and Interaction: Underline the necessity for continuous and meaningful interaction among government branches to ensure no entity exceeds its authority. Stress the importance of vigilance in maintaining the integrity of our democratic processes.
Encourage Active Civic Responsibility: Urge fellow citizens to advocate for a strong Congressional stance that prioritizes public interest over personal gain and power. Encourage collective advocacy to ensure governance is conducted responsibly, within the limits set by our cherished Constitution, ensuring efficiency and eliminating wasteful spending.
DESPERATE TIMIDITY IN ADDRESSING ISSUES
Let's venture together into the intricate dance of power and perception, where the spotlight shines on the trinity of politicians, administrative agencies, and the mass media. Imagine this as a ballet, where each performer plays a pivotal role in the unfolding drama.
The Opening Act: Our journey begins with politicians, akin to marionettes, ensnared by the strings of administrative agencies. These agencies, masters of manipulation, wield strategies and secrets to pull the levers of political decision-making.
The Strategy of Influence: Delve deeper, and we uncover the arsenal of expertise leveraged by U.S. Administrative Agencies. Picture them as chess grandmasters, each move calculated, sharing knowledge like a carefully guarded treasure to nudge politicians toward their desired stance.
The Specter of Decision Paralysis: Imagine our politicians standing at a crossroads, the path of action fogged by the fear of misstep. Each potential decision, a ticking time bomb, with the dread of negative portrayal by the omnipresent eye of the mass media.
The Media's Might: The mass media, akin to a colossal mirror reflecting society's myriad hues, holds sway over the actions and inactions of our political players. The fear of a tarnished image in this mirror leads to a dance of hesitation, steps taken with trepidation.
The Call for Courageous Leadership: We're reminded of tales of yore, where leaders, standing at the helm during storms of controversy, steered the ship with resolve. It's a call to embrace the courage to make unpopular decisions when they herald the common good.
The Path to Empowerment: Our narrative reaches a crescendo with a clarion call for heightened awareness and understanding of this dynamic interplay. Envision a world where politicians, liberated from the strings of manipulation, truly champion the cause of those they represent.
In weaving this tapestry, we draw inspiration from the pressing need for robust oversight mechanisms, judicial and public scrutiny, and public enlightenment on surveillance under Section 702. It's a clarion call for reforms that uphold privacy, ensuring the dance of governance is both transparent and true to the essence of democracy. Together, let's reflect on how we, as a society, can foster an environment where our leaders navigate these turbulent waters with wisdom and integrity, for the beacon of true leadership shines brightest in the commitment to the common good.
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE-Prioritizing National Interests?
Funding policies that serve the broader population or just the affluent and corporations; hold the following responsible:
ROBERT ADERHOLT – Alabama
MARK AMODEI – Nevada
STEPHANIE BICE - Oklahoma
KEN CALVERT – California
JERRY CARL - Alabama
JOHN CARTER - Texas
JUAN CISCOMANI – Arizona
BEN CLINE – Virginia
MICHAEL CLOUD – Texas
ANDREW CLYDE - Georgia
TOM COLE – Oklahoma
MARIO DIAZ-BALART - Florida
CHUCK EDWARDS - North Carolina
JAKE ELLZEY – Texas
CHUCK FLEISCHMANN – Tennessee
SCOTT FRANKLIN - Florida
MIKE GARCIA – California
TONY GONZALES - Texas
KAY GRANGER – Texas
MICHAEL GUEST - Mississippi
ANDY HARRIS – Maryland
ASHLEY HINSON - Iowa
DAVID JOYCE – Ohio
JAKE LATURNER - Kansas
JULIA LETLOW - Louisiana
JOHN MOOLENAAR - Michigan
DAN NEWHOUSE – Washington
GUY RESCHENTHALER - Pennsylvania
HAROLD ROGERS – Kentucky
JOHN RUTHERFORD - Florida
MICHAEL SIMPSON – Idaho
DAVID VALADAO - California
STEVE WOMACK – Arkansas
RYAN ZINKE - Montana
The above prior budget allocations have sometimes exacerbated economic disparities, favoring policies that benefit certain economic interests at the expense of the broader populace and local workers.
Their historical appropriations have been marred by a lack of transparency, making it difficult to track how funds are utilized and to hold responsible parties accountable for inefficiencies or mismanagement.
Previous funding decisions have at times been unduly influenced by political agendas and special interest groups, detracting from objective and equitable policymaking.
Past appropriations have not always provided funding mechanisms for the consistent and fair enforcement of immigration laws, leading to selective and biased implementation practices.